Category: Detail

  • What are the different methods of documentation?

    What are the different methods of documentation?

    In a 2010 study of nursing care in an Italian hospital, researchers found that just ‘40% of nursing activities observed were included in the nursing records’ (Marinis et al, 2010). Although this study was about nurses, not prehospital medics, it indicates the potential for missing key information in our documentation. A variety of models exist to help ensure that all the useful information is in your paperwork by the time it’s finalised & to ensure that it’s clear and concise…

    Before the methods are introduced, make sure to note the following:

    • There is not just one method
    • Patient report forms vary across Trusts. Essential (required) criteria varies too.
    • Policies regarding paperwork can be found publicly on most Trust websites and will be linked to from here if permission is gained.
    • There is little freely available information regarding paramedic PCR completion in the UK. Each Trust has their own policy but those policies mainly centre around mandatory fields, not around how to structure your paperwork.
    • Regardless of what you use, Gregory and Mursell’s (2010: 190) recommendations include ensuring it is ‘clear, accurate and legible [,] […] objective [and] […] first hand’. However, if your information is not first hand, they advise adding the ‘name and position’ of the person who gave you the information (2010: 190).
    • What do I do if I make a mistake in my paperwork? (link coming soon)

     

    There are 8 models of documentation for medical professionals

     

    1. The ABCDE approach
    2. The ROS, or Review of Systems approach
      1. A full model including ROS
    3. CHART
    4. CHARTIE
    5. NAP
    6. CHEATED
    7. SOAP
    8. OODA

    A few variations of these may exist where people have chosen to add a letter to the above acronyms to extend the models.

    Doctors and websites regularly used by paramedics including Geeky Medics, seem to suggest a combination of the ABCDE, ROS & SOAP approaches, depending on the patient’s presentation (Geeky Medics, 2018).

    Jump to discussion points

    Jump to references

     

    What is the ABCDE approach?

    ABCDE approach


    Simply, this involves transferring information from the DR ABCDE primary survey (Resuscitation Council, 2018) onto paper. Farrington (2018) mentions documenting this approach.

    Back to contents

     

    What is the ROS approach?

    Review of Systems Approach

    The review of systems (RoS) approach is widely used and accepted in healthcare, and easily assimilates into paramedic practice. RoS improves patient care by holistically assessing the patient, and can make the inter-professional handover of a patient to another team more professionally acceptable. Documentation using the RoS is more comprehensive and less prone to errors. (Jenkins, 2013)

     

    ROS is:

    • Also known as the systematic enquiry (Douglas et al, 2013: 35)
    • Recommended by Pilbery and Lethbridge (2010: 191) and forms the structure of the secondary surveys featured in Blaber and Harris (2011).
    • Part of many models of documentation & not strictly a model on its own
    • Involves writing a list of systems i.e. Respiratory, Cardiovascular, Central nervous, and listing examinations beneath each subsection. So, for a patient complaining of chest pain the ROS might show:

     

    Cardiovascular

    Weak radial pulse

    Tachycardic: 95.

    No added heart sounds

    Pitting oedema

    Respiratory

    Equal chest movement. No deformities to chest
    Bilateral crackles on auscultation

     

    …and so on

    (The Regents of the University of California, 2015; Snadden et al, 2013)
    *Note these are just examples and are not intended to demonstrate a complete patient report form.

    You do not have to review every system for every patient but you should review the ones that are ‘related’ to the presenting complaint or the primary affected system (Blaber and Harris, 2011: 22).

    Back to contents

    Below is one suggested way to use ROS as part of a complete patient record form:

    Presenting complaint – PC

    History of Presenting Complaint – HPC

    Past Medical History – PMH

    Drug History – DH

    Allergies

    Family History – FH

    Social History – SH

    On Examination (O/E)

    Review of Systems – ROS

    Impression – IMP

    Plan

    (Gregory & Mursell, 2010: 191; Douglas et al, 2013: 32-39)

    Variations of this model

    The Douglas et al (2013: 32-39) model includes allergies in the drug history section, names review of systems as ‘systematic enquiry’, and includes the on examination section within that enquiry, rather than before it. They also add ‘information given’ to the patient and their relatives, and ‘progress notes’ to the model (Douglas et al, 2013: 39) to separate patient progress from the initial presentation & impression.

    However, their model is not designed specifically for prehospital medics. Their example suggests the progress section should be used by Doctors who review patients at a later date. Gregory & Mursell’s (2010: 191) adaptation of this model is designed with Paramedics in mind. Still, a progress note section could be useful for prehospital documentation in situations where the patient’s condition changes in the relatively short time we spend with them. Following a structure which specifies documenting patient improvement or deterioration could help make our documentation clear. Comments? Add them below —> 

    Note, as mentioned above, that the ROS approach is part of a multitude of different approaches to writing paperwork. It is included in many of the following models either in documenting a patient’s past medical history (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 343-344) or in the secondary survey (Blaber and Harris, 2011), or both.

    Back to contents

    What is the CHART approach?

    CHART

    CHART stands for:

    • Chief complaint
    • History
    • Assessment
    • Rx = Drugs
    • Treatment

    (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 342)

    Back to contents

    What is CHARTIE?

    This is the same as the above, with two additions:

    • Intervention
    • Evaluation

    (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 342)

    Back to contents

    What is the NAP approach?

    This could be a good way to remember NAP

    Nap stands for:

    • Narrative (of the complaint)
    • Assessment
    • Plan of treatment

    (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 342)

     

    According to Beebe & Myers (2010), the three models listed above are now less frequently used, in favour of newer models like CHEATED.

    Back to contents

     

    What is CHEATED?

    CHEATED
    • Chief concern
    • History
      • Including the history of the complaint
      • Including ‘OPQRST (onset, provocation, quality of pain, radiation, severity, timing’ (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 342) where relevant
      • Including past medical history,
      • Including review of systems,
      • Including pertinent negatives.
      • Note that Beebe & Myers (2010) recommend using the review of systems structure in order to collect information about the patient’s past medical history. Other sources, including Douglas et al (2013) use the systematic enquiry/review of systems as part of the examination section.
      • Beebe & Myers (2010) include information in the history section of the CHEATED model that is more relevant for insurance-based healthcare systems. Only information relevant to UK medics has been included in this post.
    • Examination of physical signs
    • Assessment
      • Including the patient’s consent & any refusal of care
    • Treatment
    • Evaluation
      • ‘Following every treatment there should be an evaluation of the effectiveness of that treatment, or, at a minimum, a statement about the patient’s ongoing condition’ (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 346)
      • If the patient refuses care of transport, an ‘explanation of outcomes’ can be used here (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 346).
    • Disposition
      • This is a summary of the patient & their treatment at the time of handover
      • Worsening advice if the patient has been left at home

    (Beebe & Myers, 2010: 323-346)

    Back to contents

     

    What is SOAP?

    SOAP

    SOAP stands for:

    • Subjective
      • Patient’s feelings
      • Patient’s own words
      • Patient’s symptoms
    • Objective
      • Signs
      • Clinical examination
    • Assessment
      • Summary of symptoms & signs
      • Impression
    • Plan

    (Potter, 2018) – Geeky Medics

    ‘For the past 50 years, one of the primary organizing structures for physicians’ clinical documentation have been the SOAP note (Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan). The cognitive check list is well-suited to differential diagnosis but may not support detection of changes in systems and/or learning from cases.’ (Lenert, 2016)

    There are several other variations of SOAP, including SNOCAMP,  which adds the ‘nature of the presenting complaint, counseling, and medical decision making’ (Larimore & Jordan, 1995).

    Lenert (2016) have concerns about the subjective section of the SOAP model & the potential for poor decision making due to its structure. Introducing OODA…

    Back to contents

     

    What is OODA?

    OODA
    • Observe
    • Orient, including Predictions = contextualising observations, including consideration of the patient’s wishes and/or needs, prioritising, considering guidelines, consider consequences & develop plans
    • Decide
    • Act, including Predictions = treatment & considerations of outcomes

    ‘there are cognitive models that outline steps that can help novices and experienced users maintain situational awareness and learn in rapidly changing environments. One such model, which was initially developed by Boyd to help Air Force pilots outthink their opponents in aerial combat but is now widely applied within the U.S. military, is the Observe Orient Decide Act (OODA) model.’ (Lenert, 2016)

    OODA is:

    • Designed to be ‘a repeating loop’ (Lenert, 2016)
    • ‘action-oriented’ (Lenert, 2016)
    • ‘allows […] reconsideration of assumptions’ (Lenert, 2016). Put simply, it reminds us to check and re-check
    • recommended in the ‘subsequent management of patients’ where SOAP is useful in the initial approach to a patient (Lenert, 2016)

    ‘The goal of the OODA Loop is “think” and “act” faster and better than the enemy [.] […] Bad outcomes occur when medical treatments are not adjusted fast enough, based on current hypotheses about what the illness is, to outpace progression of the illness.’ (Lenert, 2016)

    It may help with ‘situational awareness, and in detecting change and errors in diagnosis.’ It may also ‘improve communications by explicitly documenting a clinician’s reasoning and decisions, much of which is not transparent in SOAP notes.’ (Lenert, 2016)

    However, it’s worth bearing in mind that neither SOAP nor OODA was originally designed for pre-hospital care.

    Back to contents

     

    Considerations/Discussion Points

    • Could OODA be used as part of a reflective framework? The model focuses on decision making and the key parts of patient assessment, which could become a reflective aid.
    • Could OODA be used for time-critical patients?
    • Could OODA be used as part of other models for when patients or situations become challenging or time-critical?
    • E.g. a patient whose initial presentation is hypoglycaemia, who requires quick decision making but may then become stable
    • e.g. a patient in an initially safe environment which later becomes unsafe & requires a new plan (for example, abusive or violent patients, relatives or bystanders, or environmental dangers)
    • In these cases, OODA could be used to document & assist with decision making during parts of jobs.
    • CHEATED, CHARTIE, OODA and Douglas et al’s (2013: 39) version which includes ROS all have some sort of evaluation featured as part of their models. A useful addition?

    Comments? Questions? Add them below –>

    Back to contents


     

    References

    Beebe, R. & Myers, J. 2010. Foundations of Paramedic Care, Volume 1. Delmar: Cengage Learning

    Blaber, A.Y. & Harris, G. 2011. Assessment skills for paramedics, Berkshire: Open University Press

    Douglas, G. et al, 2013. Macleod’s Clinical Examination, Edinburgh: Elsevier. Ed. 13.

    Farrington, G. 2018. ABCDE Approach, Available Online: https://geekymedics.com/abcde-approach/ (Accessed 16/06/18)

    Geeky Medics, 2018. Documentation. Available Online: https://geekymedics.com/category/communication-skills/documentation/ (Accessed 16/06/18)

    Gregory, P. & Mursell, I. 2010. Manual of Clinical Paramedic Procedures, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

    Jenkins, S. 2013. History taking, assessment and documentation for paramedics. Journal of Paramedic Practice, 5 (6): 310-316

    Larimore, W.L. & Jordan, E.V. 1995. SOAP to SNOCAMP: Improving the medical record format, The journal of family practice, 41 (4): 393-398

    Lenert, L.A. 2016. Toward Medical Documentation That Enhances Situational Awareness Learning, AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings Archive, 2016: 763-771

    Marinis, D. et al (2010) ‘If it is not recorded, it has not been done!’? consistency between nursing records and observed nursing care in an Italian hospital. 19. (11-12). 1544-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.03012.x

    Pilbery, R. & Lethbridge, K. 2016. Ambulance Care Practice, Bridgwater: Class Professional Publishing

    Potter, L. 2018. How to document a patient assessment (SOAP), Available Online: https://geekymedics.com/document-patient-assessment-soap/ (Accessed 16/06/18)

    Resuscitation Council, 2018. The ABCDE Approach, Available Online: https://www.resus.org.uk/resuscitation-guidelines/abcde-approach/ (Accessed 16/06/18)

    Snadden, D. et al. 2013. History Taking. In Douglas, G. et al Macleod’s Clinical Examination, Edinburgh: Elsevier. Ed.13.

    The Regents of the University of California, 2015. Adult Review of Systems. Available Online: https://meded.ucsd.edu/clinicalmed/ros.htm (Accessed 09/06/2018)

     


    Back to contents

     

    This post is yet to be peer reviewed. Human error may still exist in the reference list or in the body of the article. Please get in touch if you have any comments.
  • Free Ventilator Downloads from Smiths Medical

    Free Ventilator Downloads from Smiths Medical

    So far, Article 999 has a reasonable collection of information and videos about positive pressure breathing and ventilators used in prehospital emergency care. Smiths Medical is behind the PneuPac ParaPac. They have kindly given their permission to share the following documents, which are available for those who want to read more, find out about other available ventilators, or find an answer not available here.

    ParaPAC Plus

    BabyPAC self-assessment checklist

    BabyPAC Transport Ventilator

    Automatic Resuscitator

    Medical Care under extreme Conditions

    Difficult Environments

    An introduction to Oxygen Therapy

    Emergency and Transport Ventilation an introductory guide

    Add feedback below ↓

  • What is the relief pressure dial on the ventilator?

    What is the relief pressure dial on the ventilator?

     This article refers to the workings of Smith’s Medical Pneupac ParaPac and the newer ParaPac Plus. Other transport ventilators may vary in their settings and processes. Please check what unit your ambulance trust has before following the information here.

     

    [tabby title=”Detail”]

    The pressure of air inside our lungs is normally just right to not only ensure that negative pressure breathing occurs but also to prevent a shunt (where blood bypasses the lungs) (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 431), the oesophageal spinchter from opening, causing air to enter the stomach (Baker, 2012: 1), and a host of other potential problems. Any means of supported ventilation where the patient is not breathing for themselves produces positive pressure ventilation. Not only does this change the way air enters the patient’s lungs while they are ventilated, but it also comes with all of the above risks if any of the settings are incorrect, and more.

    Many of the effects ‘are related to mean airway pressure [which is] […] the average pressure applied to the airway during the ventilatory cycle’ (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 420) With too ⇑ pressure comes ⇓ venous return (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 420) and ⇑ chance of barotrauma (Baker, 2016: 75).

    To summarise, the potential negative effects are:

    • Blood bypassing the lungs (a shunt) (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 431)
    • Air entering the stomach (Baker, 2012: 1)
    • Venous return decreasing (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 420)
    • Barotrauma (Baker, 2016: 75)

    Because modern ventilators are volume-controlled, preventing a different problem that occurs during pressure-controlled ventilation, there is a set tidal volume which the ventilator will always provide to the patient. To provide this volume, the pressure will constantly increase until the volume is reached (Baker, 2016: 132).

    The Means of Avoiding These Problems

    In ventilators, the pressure of an oxygen cylinder ‘is lowered through a reducing valve down to 30-90psi’ from 2000psi. It’s then delivered to the patient ‘to a maximum of 40cmh20 or 60cmh20’, (Baker, 2012: 18)*, depending on whether you’re in the UK or the US.

    *cmh20 = centimetres of water pressure (SensorsONE, 2017)

    Since we can’t have too much pressure there needs to be a way of stopping the ventilator if things get awry. The relief pressure is what this refers to. Via a safety valve (Baker, 2012), otherwise known as ‘exhaust valves’ the supply is cut and excess peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) is released into the atmosphere (Zaconeta et al, 2010), ‘prevent[ing] over-ventilation of the lungs’ (Baker, 2016: 145)

    Why would the pressure get this high anyway?

    • ‘The patient circuit […] [could be] blocked or kinked’ (Baker, 2016: 142). Best to check it.
    • ‘If the lung compliance[*] is low and the airway resistance is high the pressure can rise to high levels’ because, as above, the pressure will keep rising until the set tidal volume is delivered (Baker, 2016: 142).
    • The wrong relief pressure settings.

    *Compliance ‘refers to the ease of expansion of the lungs and the walls of the thorax’ (Baker, 2012: 8). Ordinarily, according to Baker (2012: 8), the value is 100 cmh20 but when ventilated it’s 40-50cmh20. Physical injuries and medical conditions may further alter this figure.

    Which dial are you talking about?

    This one

    The Pneupac ParaPac (Smiths Medical). Photo highlights the Relief Pressure dial.

    What should I set it to?

    40cmh20 if you’re in the UK (Baker, 2012)

    Why is the relief pressure set at 40cmh20 in the UK? Why is it 60cmh20 in the US?

    Article 999 is struggling to find the answers to these questions. If you know the answers, please get it touch. It would be great to add the information to this resource.

    This post is yet to be peer reviewed. Please get in touch if you have any comments.

     

    [tabby title=”Super Summary”]

    Article 999 previously posted an article on positive pressure ventilation, including its risks. The aim of positive pressure ventilation is to ‘maximise the potential benefit of mechanical ventilation while minimizing the potential for harm’ (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 407). The relief pressure dial on the ventilator ensures that the pressure of ventilation is not so high as to cause blood bypassing the lungs (Hess & Kackmarek, 2014: 407), the oesophageal spinchter opening (Baker, 2012: 1), barotrauma (Baker, 2016: 75; Hess & Kackmarek, 2014) and more. The ventilator’s other settings ensure that the patient actually receives ventilation, but the relief pressure setting ensures that a valve drains excess air when settings, poor setup, or the patient’s lung compliance (Baker, 2016: 43) have caused the pressure to get to high.

    What should I set it to?

    40cmh20 (Baker, 2012)

    What should I look out for if the pressure is too high?

    Kinked tubing (Baker, 2016: 142) & your settings

    Read more in the Detail tab.

    [tabby title=”Prefer to see a diagram? Check out the mind-map summary”]

     

    [tabby title=”References”]

    References

    Baker, D. 2012. Emergency and Transport Ventilation, an introductory guide, Smiths Medical International Limited: Luton

    Baker, D.J. 2016. Artificial Ventilation: A Basic Clinical Guide. Springer International: Switzerland

    Hess, D.R. & Kacmarek, R.M. 2014. Essentials of Mechanical Ventilation. McGraw Hill Education: New York

    SensorsONE, 2017. cmh20 – Centimetres of Water Column at 4 deg C Pressure Unit, Available Online: https://www.sensorsone.com/cmh2o-centimetres-water-column-4-deg-c-pressure-unit/ (Accessed 16/11/17)

    Zaconeta, C.A.M. et al, 2010. ‘Evaluation of peak inspiratory pressure and respiratory rate during ventilation of a preterm infant lung model with a self-inflating bag by paramedics of the Fire Department’, Revista Paulista de Pediatria, vol. 28. No. 1.

    Not endorsed by but with thanks to Smiths Medical for providing information.

    [tabbyending]

     

  • What is positive pressure breathing?

    What is positive pressure breathing?

    Positive pressure refers to the way artificial ventilation ‘inflate[s] the lungs’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014). ‘Normal breathing depends on drawing in air to the lungs by creating a partial vacuum inside the chest cavity’ (Baker, 2016: vi). The mean airway pressure, an average combined of ‘the amount and duration of pressure applied during’ expiratory and inspiratory phases in normal breathing is negative (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 420 ebook). See the article on negative pressure breathing for more information. Intermittent positive pressure ventilation, on the other hand, is for inspiration the ‘exact reverse of this process with air being forced into the lungs’ (Baker, 2016: vi).

    Positive pressure ventilation includes the use of bag-valve-masks, but the majority of this article will focus on the ventilator.

    Upcoming articles will discuss the specific settings and how-tos relating to the Pneupac ParaPac ventilator. Current links:

    What is Negative Pressure Breathing?

    The Discovery of Negative and Positive Pressure Ventilation

    What is the relief pressure dial on the ventilator?

     

    [tabby title=”Inspiration: Expiration”]

    Inspiration: Expiration

    Ventilators have 4 phases of operation:
    1. ‘The inspiratory phase’
    2. ‘Cycling between the inspiratory (I) and expiratory (E) phase’
    3. ‘The expiratory phase’
    4. ‘Cycling between the E and I phase’
    (Baker, 2016: 117)

    The majority of ventilators are set to an I (Inspiratory) to E (Expiratory) ratio of 1:2, i.e. the expiratory phase is twice as long as the inspiratory phase, ‘which mirrors normal breathing’ (Baker, 2016: 108). If required, some ventilators allow this setting to ‘be altered to assist with restrictive lung diseases’ (Baker, 2016: 108). ICU ventilators contain additional settings that alter this ratio, including a ‘respiratory pause’ between the I and E phases ‘to allow distribution of gas within the lungs’ (Baker, 2016: 108).

    [tabby title=”Mechanics”]

    Mechanics

    So, inspiration occurs when air is ‘forced into the lungs’ (Baker, 2016: vi). Expiration, however, occurs when ‘the ventilator stops delivering a positive pressure and the patient breaths out passively, as in normal breathing. This passive expiration (E) is ensured by the elastic recoil of the lungs and the chest wall’ (Baker, 2016: 108). The timing is aided by a ‘pneumatic oscillator’ (Baker, 2016: 22).

    The gas is delivered by the ‘patient circuit’, which also ‘evacuate[s] expired CO2’ (Baker, 2016: 109). This is delivered ‘as close as possible to the airway device being used’ by a valve (Baker, 2016: 109). There are also filters to prevent contamination of the ventilator from the patient.

    Early ventilators had a ‘lack of interactivity with the patient’s own breathing efforts if there was only partial respiratory failure’ (Baker, 2016: 22) but modern ventilators tend to have different modes to account for this and additional settings beyond a simple tidal volume dial. In particular, ventilators feature a ‘demand valve’ which detects when a patient takes a breath (Baker, 2016: 22). There are also settings for tidal volume and ventilation frequency. These settings will be discussed in upcoming articles.

    The Pneupac ParaPac (Smiths Medical)

    Read more: What is the relief pressure dial on the ventilator?

    [tabby title=”The Positives and Negatives”]

    The Positives and Negatives

    The main positive effect of artificial ventilation is fairly obvious: it assists with the ventilation of a patient who is completely or partially unable to breathe normally. There are however a number of negative effects created by positive pressure ventilation. Related to these is the fact that mechanical ventilation can cause ‘heterogeneity’ of the lungs, meaning that ‘some lung units are prone to overdistension and others are prone to collapse’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 493). These are part of the reason most ventilators have relief pressure settings. This setting will be discussed in an upcoming article. You can check back here for the link.

    Positive pressure ventilation can cause or effect the following:

    The following are unavoidable results of ventilator use:

    Decreased cardiac output
    …Leading to ‘hypotension and potential tissue hypoxia. This effect is greatest with high mean airway pressure, high lung compliance, and low circulating blood volume’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 513). The high pressure ‘decreases venous return and right heart filling, which may reduce cardiac output’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 513).

    I.e:
    High pressure –> decreased venous return
    Low pressure –> increased venous return

    This pressure is normally lowest ‘during inhalation’, so venous return would be highest. But with positive pressure ventilation, ‘venous return is greatest during exhalation’ as opposed to inhalation (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 513-520).

    Renal and gastric effects
    Mechanical ventilation reduces urine output due to ‘decreased renal perfusion’ which results from ‘decreased cardiac output’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 527). Unfortunately this can cause many of the issues common with fluid retention. Similarly, gastric distension can result, along with gastrointestinal bleeding’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 533).

    Increased intracranial pressure
    …in head injury patients, due to ‘a decrease in venous return, which increases intracranial blood volume and pressure’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 540).

    Pneumonia may occur, especially due to invasive ventilation which is the form in emergency practice (non-invasive refers to ventilatory support such as CPAP). It ‘results from aspiration of oropharnygeal secretions around the cuff of the endotracheal tube’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 499).

    The following can occur as a result of ventilator settings:

    Hyperventilation and hypoventilation
    These risk effecting the pH, and causing respiratory alkalosis (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 499)

    Oxygen Toxicity due to high oxygen levels (Hess, 2014: 506)

    A Shunt is usually partly decreased but settings can change this:
    A shunt is ‘perfusion (blood flow) without ventilation’, which happens ‘when blood flows from the right heart to the left heart without participating in gas exchange’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 427). There are two different types of shunts: capillary and anatomic. The first occurs when the alveoli are not ventilated. One example of this is pneumonia (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 427). The latter type of shunt occurs when blood flow ‘completely bypasses the lungs’, which can sometimes happen with ‘congenital cardiac defects’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 427).

    Positive Pressure Ventilation’s typical effect is to decrease capillary shunt by improving ‘the distribution of ventilation, particularly by improving the ventilation of previously underventilated areas of the lungs’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 427-446)

    Despite the above improvements, if the settings are not ideal hypoxemia can result. This is the same outcome as a shunt but would in this case be caused by ‘redistribution of pulmonary blood flow to unventilated regions’ due to ‘overdistension of some lung units’ (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 324). Positive pressure ventilation can also increase anatomic shunt (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 441)

    Also due to incorrect settings, the following can occur as a lack of pressure or volume:

    Atelectasis occurs when the pressure or volume during or after artificial ventilation isn’t enough to inflate the lungs –> complete or partial collapse.

    Atelectasis ‘is larger with obese patients and when a higher fraction of inspired oxygen (FI02) is used […]. During mechanical ventilation […] atelectasis may occur when lungs are underinflated due to low tidal volumes, or when compression occurs (such as patient position or obesity)’ (Open Anesthesia, 2017). If the volume or pressure isn’t enough to ‘prevent the alveoli from collapsing’ (Open Anesthesia, 2017) then regardless of ventilator type (pressure vs volume controlled) atelectasis may result.

    The following can occur as a result of apparatus setup:

    Dead Space can be increased by mechanical ventilation (Hess & Kacmarek, 2014: 471). It may be ‘reduced by an artificial airway (ETT) but is increased by increasing distance from the end of the ETT to the means of evacuating CO2 in mechanical ventilation’ (Baker, 2016: 111). Size, age, upright postures and neck extension also increase it (Baker, 2016: 111).

    The following can occur due to overdistension:

    Barotrauma = ‘alveolar rupture due to overdistension’, which can cause numerous problems including pneumothorax (Hess, 2014: 480). Volume generators have a ‘safety valve which activates at a preset pressure’ to avoid barotrauma’ (Baker, 2016: 118). This will be discussed in an upcoming article.

    Ventilator-Induced lung injury caused by overdistension. Massively effected by ventilator settings for tidal volume and relief pressure (Hess, 2014: 493)

    There are additional risks of positive pressure ventilation, particularly mechanical ventilation. Some of these are related to the use of airway adjuncts. Others are related to the removal of the ventilator. To read more, check out the references below.

    [tabby title=”Types of Positive Pressure Ventilation”]

    Types of Positive Pressure Ventilation

    ‘A spectrum of modes exist between total artificial ventilation and a patient who is still breathing spontaneously but with reduced efforts’ (Baker, 2016: 105).

    There are two main types of ventilators:
    – Pressure generated
    – Volume generated

    Pressure generators ‘provide a constant pressure during the inspiratory phase’ (Baker, 2016: 118). Volume generators release gas once a set volume has been reached. In each one, only the pressure or the volume is a constant. Everything else is relative and will adjust until the preset parameter of volume or pressure has been reached (Baker, 2016; Hess, 2014).

    Issues
    ‘The problem of pressure generation is that it cannot guarantee an adequate Vt [volume] in situations where the lung mechanics are abnormal or where a guaranteed Vt is required due to life-threatening hypoxia. They are therefore not suitable for most emergency ventilation, with the notable exception of neonatal and infant ventilation where flow generators are contraindicated due to the fragility of the lung tissue’ (Baker, 2016: 118).

    Additional Types
    Most ventilators switch from inspiration to expiration by ‘time cycling’ (Baker, 2016: 119). However, this can also be due to volume or pressure cycling. The time cycling ratio is usually 1:2 for I:E, in other words the expiration time is twice as long as the inhalation time. ‘Ventilation modes can best be understood as a spectrum describing the work of breathing done by the ventilator and by the patient’ (Baker, 2016: 122.

    The modes are: Controlled Mandatory Ventilation, in which ‘ventilation is provided entirely by the ventilator’ (Baker, 2016: 122), Assisted Controlled Ventilation which is fairly self-explanatory, and Synchronised Mandatory Ventilation, in which ‘the patient’s respiratory efforts in initiating a ventilation are synchronised with ventilations provided automatically by the ventilator.’ This is best used to supplement the patient’s efforts. It’s otherwise known as ‘assist-control’ and is typically found in ICU. (Baker, 2016: 123).

    In portable ventilators the modes are:
    Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation, Synchronised intermittent mandatory ventilation, and synchronised mandatory minute volume but only the latter two are still in use. The second overcomes the problems of the first, ensuring that breaths are supplemented by the ventilator and that supplemented breaths are activated only when there is a certain trigger e.g. low pressure. There is a modern, more complex version of this now in use in hospitals but this may exist in emergency ventilation practice to assist a patient who is ‘in partial respiratory failure’ (Baker, 2016: 124).

    The first two divide minute volume between the ventilator and the second. The latter is based on time, which is compared with a ‘set minute volume. If there is a discrepancy between the actual minute volume and the set delivered minute volume, an automatic ventilation is delivered which corrects the difference’ (Baker, 2016: 124).

    Because there is an issue of the ventilator being unable to tell the difference between dead space ventilation and alveolar ventilation, Pneupac have modified the above with a series of Ifs (if the patient takes a breath, if there is no further breath, if the tidal volume is too low, etc) that adjusts settings accordingly (Baker, 2016: 124). There are more modes that exist for ICU ventilators, which tend to be a lot more complex in design (Baker, 2016).

    Read about the solution: What is the relief pressure dial on the ventilator?

    [tabby title=”CPAP and BIPAP”]

    CPAP

    CPAP is also a form of positive pressure breathing and is designed ‘to improve oxygenation in lungs that may not be exchanging oxygen with the blood adequately’ (Baker, 2016: 126). There is a constant pressure in CPAP, versus ‘different pressures during inspiration and expiration’ in BIPAP’ but both are designed to allow the patient to do all the work of breathing. They merely increase oxygen and make inspiration easier while increasing the work of expiration. ‘Breathing with CPAP has been compared to the sensation of breathing against a very strong wind’ (Baker, 2016: 128). They ‘open up (recruit) alveoli in the lungs that may be non-ventilated.’ (Baker, 2016: 127). Both push back fluid ‘into the circulation via lymphatic drainage of the lung interstitial space’ and increase ‘the diffusion of oxygen into the pulmonary capillaries’ (Baker, 2016: 127).

    [tabby title=”PEEP”]

    PEEP

    Positive End Expiratory Ventilation applies ‘a positive pressure to the patient during the expiratory phase’ to ‘increase the functional residual capacity of the lungs and thus the efficiency of oxygenation of the blood’ (Baker, 2016: 126). ‘In order to be able to deliver a set tidal volume against variable lung compliance and airway resistance, resuscitation ventilators should be time-cycled, volume preset flow generators’ (Baker, 2016: 132).

     

    References

    Baker, D.J. 2016. Artificial Ventilation: A Basic Clinical Guide (ebook), Springer International: Switzerland

    Hess, D. & Kacmarek, R.M. 2014. Essential of Mechanical Ventilation (ebook), McGraw-Hill Education: New York

    Open Anesthesia, 2017. Ventilator Settings: atelecasis, Available Online: https://www.openanesthesia.org/ventilator_settings_atelectasis/ (Accessed 09/11/17)

    [tabbyending]

     

    This post is yet to be peer reviewed. Please get in touch if you have any comments.
  • Considering the Differential Diagnoses of Chest Pain? Consider This.

    Considering the Differential Diagnoses of Chest Pain? Consider This.

    Guest Post, by Paul Burgess of Athletic Nutrition.

    There is a common misconception that if someone experiences heart burn it is because they have too much stomach acid that is passing up the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The LES is the valve which, in a healthy person, prevents this from happening. Interestingly, many patients presenting with heart burn actually have LOW stomach acid, which results in the same symptoms.

     

    [tabby title=”Super Summary”]

    • Low stomach acid is more likely to be the cause of heartburn
    • Bloating and food intolerances may be heightened by low stomach acid
    • Anti acid medications can make the problem worse
    • Getting into a decent sleep pattern can make all the difference.

    [tabby title=”Anatomy in Images”]

    The Stomach’s location
    The stomach in relation to other organs

    [tabby title=”What causes low stomach acid?”]

    Low stomach acid is the result of many factors that come into play at the same time. These factors, or causes are common in our modern day lifestyle, far more common than the causes of potentially high stomach acid. Their prevalence means that in the majority of cases you can be pretty sure that the cause of heart burn is not high but low stomach acid.

    Attributing causes are:
    • Poor sleep
    • Under eating (e.g on a diet)
    • Stress
    • Too much exercise in a calorie deprived state
    • Over use of antibiotics
    • Regular use of NSAIDs
    • H Pylori
    • Eating too quickly
    • Small intestinal bacteria overgrowth
    • Yeast infections
    • Food sensitivities
    • Age
    • Alcohol

    Now if you look through the list above you probably know a few people (if not many) who fit into at least 3 or 4 of those categories. If nothing else most people are sleep deprived and even if they do actually get to bed, the quality of their sleep is poor and broken. A high number of people have been on some kind of diet (which usually means calorie restriction) for many years. They are likely stressed and probably have a drink now and then.

    As you can see, it’s easy to live what is considered an apparently ‘normal’ lifestyle nowadays, a lifestyle that causes low stomach acid.

     

    [tabby title=”What is Stomach Acid & Why Is It Important?”]

    Stomach acid is also called hydrochloric acid due to its chemical structure of one hydrogen ion combined to one chlorine ion, making HCL. It is responsible for sterilizing any food that wishes to make it into your gut. It assists with killing off viruses, yeast, parasites and breaking down protein.

    Its most important role is the breakdown of protein in to its constituent amino acid parts, ready for absorption later in the digestive process.

    So, without adequate levels of stomach acid, there is a vicious cycle of poor digestion, chronic gut inflammation, microbial overgrowth, leaky gut, elevated stress hormones and lowered nutrient absorption. The only things that will break this loop are to reduce stress in all its forms and support adequate stomach acid production.

    [tabbyending]

    [tabby title=”So What’s Wrong With Omeprazole?”]

    This is the problem with mistaking low stomach acid symptoms for high stomach acid:

    The GP will recommend any one of a number of anti-acid medications such as Omeprazole, or the patient will self medicate with over the counter remedies such as Rennies or Gaviscon.

    If this is the case it will stop the feeling of heartburn BUT it will actually push the stomach acid down even further. Once this happens the health of the patient will decline over time due to even poorer absorption of nutrients, higher chances of bacterial infections and higher elevation of stress hormones.

    [tabby title=”So What’s the Answer?”]

    So what’s the answer?

    Its pretty simple really. The first thing to do is manage the lifestyle factors causing the issue in the first place. Better sleep, manage stress, less alcohol, etc.

    From a support point of view a good digestive enzyme that includes HCL with each meal would be all you really need to stop the pain immediately. For good measure, a 30 day course of probitiocs to improve the good bacteria in the gut would be a positive step.

    [tabby title=”Questions To Be Answered Soon”]

    Should we continue encouraging patients to try their own gaviscon in non-cardiac sounding chest pain as a one-off measure to see if it resolves the pain?

    If the gaviscon does resolve the pain, what does this tell us about the likely cause of the chest pain? (Remember, trop-t levels may still be necessary).

    Do acidic or alkaline foods affect the reflux much?

    [tabbyending]

    This was the first of Article 999’s Guest Posts, posts that have been written by other professionals. These posts, unlike the remainder of Article 999’s, are not referenced to academic sources as they are the expert opinion of the author. These posts are additions to the category of ‘nice to know’. Please remember to check your local guidelines and read our full disclaimer before putting into practice anything you see here.

    Comments? Questions? Let us know what you think by adding your comments below.

    This post is yet to be peer reviewed. Please get in touch if you have any comments.
  • Article Summary: Maxillofacial Trauma Patient

    Article Summary: Maxillofacial Trauma Patient

    An summary of a Krausz et al (2009) article discussing the importance of effective airway management in the maxillofacial trauma patient and the complexities that such an injury presents. Only points relevant to UK paramedics have been included. For more details, please read the original article. Any additions made by Article 999 are in square brackets [].

    [restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” pills=”nav-pills” responsive=”false” tabcolor=”#6ad61d”]
    [restab title=”Full Summary and Reference” active=”active”]

    The Key Points

    • Remember to follow ATLS protocol [and/or your local guidance and JRCALC guidelines]
    • Use cervical spine control along with effective airway management
    • ‘The most common critical care errors are related to airway and respiratory management. Gruen et al studied 25 trauma mortality patients […] [and] found that failure to intubate, secure or protect the airway was […] responsible for 16% of inpatient deaths’ [and that was in a trauma centre, albeit in 1996-2004!] (Gruen et al, 2006)

    Hutchinson et al (1990) (in Krausz et al, 2009) found 6 potential ways maxillofacial trauma might prevent effective airway management.

    These, from the top of the head downwards, can be summarised as:

    Head and soft tissue trauma
    – These risk ‘delayed airway compromise’

    Nasal bleeding/open wounds causing obstruction

    Mandible fractures
    – Leading to the tongue to drop back, blocking the oropharnyx
    – Leading to blockage of the nasopharnygeal airway

    Mouth obstructions
    – From loose items & bodily fluids

    Tracheal trauma
    – Leading to swelling and displacement of essential airway structures behind them.

    C-spine injury
    – Leading to the need for “in-line stablization”. This can cause a reduced view during intubation
    – The act of intubating might increase neck movements, potentially worsening this injury

    Stomach
    – [All patients ambulance personnel intubate in the prehospital environment might realistically have a full stomach]
    – Note the risk of regurgitation
    – Consider cricoid pressure – but also consider that this might ‘worsen the larnygeal view’
    – Other tips noted in this section are not relevant to UK paramedics. Please read the full article for more information

    These cause:
    – Difficulties fitting a mask
    – Less ‘efficient air transferring from the mask to the lungs’
    – A ‘difficulty in visualizing the vocal cords’ when intubating due to fluids & obstructions

    Final points

    • Consider all of the above and ‘avoid future complications’. Then address other injuries.
    • Emergency intubation is fraught with risks
    • Consider your expertise and experience. Ensure the trauma patient can access ‘the most experienced personnel’ where possible. This would reduce one of the risks.
    • Ensure prompt treatment
    • Consider the patient’s GCS, breathing level & risk to aid your decision making about transport
    • Check the ‘extent, the composition and the anatomy of the injury’. Is it possible to ventilate with a mask?
    • ‘Is there a limitation in mouth opening? Is that limitation the result of pain’ only? [In a prehospital environment, this may be difficult to ascertain]
    • An LMA may ‘not be suitable for managing trauma patients. However, it could enable ventilating the patient until definitive airway is achieved’

    References

    Gruen, R.L. et al. 2006. Patterns of Errors Contributing to Trauma Mortality: Lessons Learned from 2594 Deaths, Annals of Surgery, 244 (3): 371-380, Available Online:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1856538/

    Krausz, A. et al. 2009. Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway, World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 4: 21, Available Online: https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1749-7922-4-21

    [/restab]
    [restab title=”Article 999 Super Summary”]

    Remember to follow ATLS protocol [and your local guidelines], use cervical spine control and focus on airway management.

    Head and soft tissue trauma, nasal bleeding or open wounds, mandible fractures, mouth obstructions, tracheal trauma, c-spine injury and the patient’s stomach contents can all make airway management more challenging (Hutchinson et al, 1990 in Krausz et al, 2009).

    Top tips?

    • Consider cricoid pressure but bear in mind it may actually worsen your view during intubation.
    • Ensure rapid transport and treatment of the patient and consider your own expertise.
    • What level of experience do you really need to deal with this patient, who has it, and where are they?
    • The patient’s GCS, breathing level and risk should all support this decision.
    • You can use an LMA, but it’s a time-stop measure [Article 999 interpretation; see full summary].
    • Consider the ‘extent’ of the patient’s injuries and how they are going to make it difficult to use a mask and intubate if required.

    (Krausz et al, 2009)

    [/restab]
    [/restab][/restabs]

  • OP Airways VS LMAs and ETI

    OP Airways VS LMAs and ETI

    Oropharyngeal Airway (Guedel),adjunct used to maintain a patient airway

    According to research by Khosraven et al (2015) one of the main disadvantages of an OP airway is that its length, shape & lack of an inflatable cuff may cause oxygen to leak, leading to less oxygen than we might hope for entering the patient’s lungs.

    (more…)