Category: Nice to know

  • 15 Percent of 7 Year Olds ‘Have Eczema, Asthma or Hay Fever’

    15 Percent of 7 Year Olds ‘Have Eczema, Asthma or Hay Fever’

    Reference:

    Newell, S.J. And Darling, 2014. J.C. Paediatrics: Lecture Notes, Ninth Edition, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex

  • We interrupt these licensed images posts with…

    We interrupt these licensed images posts with…

    Article 999, being a website designed to provide reasonably trustworthy answers to paramedic/EMT questions, along with fast facts and a soon to be launched video library, normally abides by the academic, very legal, I’m-spending-far-too-much-a-month-on-good-design-and-royalty-free-photos, but not today. Today, we bring you an incredibly useful alternative to the Wong-Baker FACES pain scale (Wong-Baker Faces, 2016), the ‘highly unofficial LEGO Pain Assessment Chart’ by Life of Dad (Moles, 2014).

    Perhaps otherwise known as a gentle criticism to the Wong-Baker (2016) scale, I thought Article 999’s image collection would go amiss without this attractive alternative:

    https://www.lifeofdad.com/more-proof-that-everything-is-better-with-lego/

     

    If you want to find this scale on the go, simply type in Article 999’s search box, FACES, pain scale, or Lego. Go ahead, try it*

     

    *Obviously not endorsed by any organisation. The image’s usefulness is judged by this paramedic alone.

     

    References

    Moles, Jason (2014) More Proof that Everything is Better with Lego, Available Online: https://www.lifeofdad.com/more-proof-that-everything-is-better-with-lego/ (Accessed 09/09/2017)

    Wong-Baker FACES (2016) Wong-Baker FACES Foundation, Available Online: http://wongbakerfaces.org/ (Accessed 09/09/2017)

  • By 5 Years Old 7 Percent of Children Have Had a Seizure

    By 5 Years Old 7 Percent of Children Have Had a Seizure

    Reference:

    Newell, S.J. And Darling, 2014. J.C. Paediatrics: Lecture Notes, Ninth Edition, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex

  • Choking Doesn’t Always Happen Instantly After Putting Something in Your Mouth

    Choking Doesn’t Always Happen Instantly After Putting Something in Your Mouth

    Reference:

    Newell, S.J. And Darling, 2014. J.C. Paediatrics: Lecture Notes, Ninth Edition, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex

  • No SOB, No DIB, But It Is Still Pneumonia

    No SOB, No DIB, But It Is Still Pneumonia

    Reference:

    Newell, S.J. And Darling, 2014. J.C. Paediatrics: Lecture Notes, Ninth Edition, John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex

  • What are the main sections used for?

    What are the main sections used for?

    [tabby title=”This tab: 3) What are the main sections used for?” open=”yes”]

    Section 2 Purpose: Admission for patient assessment.

    Duration of section: 28 days

     

     

    Section 3 Purpose: Admission for treatment of a patient.

    Duration of section: up to 6 months

     

    Section 4 Purpose: Urgent admission for patient assessment from the community, usually enforced when a section 2 would take to long to enact.

    Duration of section: 72 hours (may be converted to section 2 to extend assessment period to 28 days)

     

     

    Section 5(2) Purpose: Urgent detention of inpatient

    Duration of section: 72 hours

     

    Section 5(4) Purpose: Urgent detention of an inpatient by a nurse were a doctor is absent

    Duration of section: 6 hours

     

    Section 135 Purpose: Removal of person from home to place of safety. This requires a court order to enact and remove someone from a private property.

    Duration of section: 72 hours

     

    Section 136 Purpose: Removal of a person from a public place to a place of safety. This does not require a court order.

    Duration of section: 72 hours

     

    Community Treatment Order Purpose: An order that a patient is placed upon after discharge from hospital for psychiatric treatment that allows continued treatment within the community setting.

    Duration of section: up to 6 months.

    References

    • Crown Copyright (1983) Mental Health Act 1983 [online]. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/contents (Accessed 21/07/17) (amended by the Mental Health Act 2007)
    • J. Collier, M. Longmore, T. Turmezel and A. R. Mafi. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Specialties, 8th edition, Oxford University press, 2008, pp: 398-401

    [tabbyurl title =”1. What is a section?” url=”https://article999.co.uk/what-is-a-section” indicator=”ext”]

    [tabbyurl title=”2. Who can enforce a sectioning order?” url=”https://article999.co.uk/can-enforce-sectioning-order” indicator=”ext”]

    [tabbyending]

  • Who can enforce a sectioning order?

    Who can enforce a sectioning order?

    [tabby title=”2. This tab: Who can enforce a sectioning order?” open=”yes”]

    There are several different types of sectioning orders as listed in the relevant tabs. Each one is used for different purposes, lasts for different lengths of time and can be used by a variety of different health care professionals and police officers. However, not everyone may use every type of order. The following are the sectioning powers available to the following professions:

     

    Nurses: Section 5 (4)
    Nurses: Section 5 (4)

     

    Doctors: Section 5 (2)
    Doctors: Section 5 (2)

     

    Police Officers: Sections 135 and 136
    Police Officers: Sections 135 and 136

     

    A mental health professional and doctor:
    A mental health professional and doctor:

    Approved mental health professionals (social workers, nurses, psychologists or occupational therapists) and rarely relatives may also put an application in for sections 2, 3 and 4. These all require approval by 1 or more doctors to be carried out.

     

    References

    • Crown Copyright (1983) Mental Health Act 1983 [online]. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1983/20/contents (Accessed 21/07/17) (amended by the Mental Health Act 2007)
    • J. Collier, M. Longmore, T. Turmezel and A. R. Mafi. Oxford Handbook of Clinical Specialties, 8th edition, Oxford University press, 2008, pp: 398-401

    [tabbyurl title=”1. What is a section?” url=”https://article999.co.uk/what-is-a-section” indicator=”ext”]

    [tabbyurl title=”3. What are the main sections used for?” url=”https://article999.co.uk/main-sections-used” indicator=”ext”]

    [tabbyending]

  • Article Summary: Maxillofacial Trauma Patient

    Article Summary: Maxillofacial Trauma Patient

    An summary of a Krausz et al (2009) article discussing the importance of effective airway management in the maxillofacial trauma patient and the complexities that such an injury presents. Only points relevant to UK paramedics have been included. For more details, please read the original article. Any additions made by Article 999 are in square brackets [].

    [restabs alignment=”osc-tabs-left” pills=”nav-pills” responsive=”false” tabcolor=”#6ad61d”]
    [restab title=”Full Summary and Reference” active=”active”]

    The Key Points

    • Remember to follow ATLS protocol [and/or your local guidance and JRCALC guidelines]
    • Use cervical spine control along with effective airway management
    • ‘The most common critical care errors are related to airway and respiratory management. Gruen et al studied 25 trauma mortality patients […] [and] found that failure to intubate, secure or protect the airway was […] responsible for 16% of inpatient deaths’ [and that was in a trauma centre, albeit in 1996-2004!] (Gruen et al, 2006)

    Hutchinson et al (1990) (in Krausz et al, 2009) found 6 potential ways maxillofacial trauma might prevent effective airway management.

    These, from the top of the head downwards, can be summarised as:

    Head and soft tissue trauma
    – These risk ‘delayed airway compromise’

    Nasal bleeding/open wounds causing obstruction

    Mandible fractures
    – Leading to the tongue to drop back, blocking the oropharnyx
    – Leading to blockage of the nasopharnygeal airway

    Mouth obstructions
    – From loose items & bodily fluids

    Tracheal trauma
    – Leading to swelling and displacement of essential airway structures behind them.

    C-spine injury
    – Leading to the need for “in-line stablization”. This can cause a reduced view during intubation
    – The act of intubating might increase neck movements, potentially worsening this injury

    Stomach
    – [All patients ambulance personnel intubate in the prehospital environment might realistically have a full stomach]
    – Note the risk of regurgitation
    – Consider cricoid pressure – but also consider that this might ‘worsen the larnygeal view’
    – Other tips noted in this section are not relevant to UK paramedics. Please read the full article for more information

    These cause:
    – Difficulties fitting a mask
    – Less ‘efficient air transferring from the mask to the lungs’
    – A ‘difficulty in visualizing the vocal cords’ when intubating due to fluids & obstructions

    Final points

    • Consider all of the above and ‘avoid future complications’. Then address other injuries.
    • Emergency intubation is fraught with risks
    • Consider your expertise and experience. Ensure the trauma patient can access ‘the most experienced personnel’ where possible. This would reduce one of the risks.
    • Ensure prompt treatment
    • Consider the patient’s GCS, breathing level & risk to aid your decision making about transport
    • Check the ‘extent, the composition and the anatomy of the injury’. Is it possible to ventilate with a mask?
    • ‘Is there a limitation in mouth opening? Is that limitation the result of pain’ only? [In a prehospital environment, this may be difficult to ascertain]
    • An LMA may ‘not be suitable for managing trauma patients. However, it could enable ventilating the patient until definitive airway is achieved’

    References

    Gruen, R.L. et al. 2006. Patterns of Errors Contributing to Trauma Mortality: Lessons Learned from 2594 Deaths, Annals of Surgery, 244 (3): 371-380, Available Online:
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1856538/

    Krausz, A. et al. 2009. Maxillofacial trauma patient: coping with the difficult airway, World Journal of Emergency Surgery, 4: 21, Available Online: https://wjes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1749-7922-4-21

    [/restab]
    [restab title=”Article 999 Super Summary”]

    Remember to follow ATLS protocol [and your local guidelines], use cervical spine control and focus on airway management.

    Head and soft tissue trauma, nasal bleeding or open wounds, mandible fractures, mouth obstructions, tracheal trauma, c-spine injury and the patient’s stomach contents can all make airway management more challenging (Hutchinson et al, 1990 in Krausz et al, 2009).

    Top tips?

    • Consider cricoid pressure but bear in mind it may actually worsen your view during intubation.
    • Ensure rapid transport and treatment of the patient and consider your own expertise.
    • What level of experience do you really need to deal with this patient, who has it, and where are they?
    • The patient’s GCS, breathing level and risk should all support this decision.
    • You can use an LMA, but it’s a time-stop measure [Article 999 interpretation; see full summary].
    • Consider the ‘extent’ of the patient’s injuries and how they are going to make it difficult to use a mask and intubate if required.

    (Krausz et al, 2009)

    [/restab]
    [/restab][/restabs]

  • OP Airways VS LMAs and ETI

    OP Airways VS LMAs and ETI

    Oropharyngeal Airway (Guedel),adjunct used to maintain a patient airway

    According to research by Khosraven et al (2015) one of the main disadvantages of an OP airway is that its length, shape & lack of an inflatable cuff may cause oxygen to leak, leading to less oxygen than we might hope for entering the patient’s lungs.

    (more…)